Notes On: The Art of Captivating Conversation – Patrick King

Introduction

I’ve finished reading The Art of Captivating Conversation by Patrick King. I made notes from the most interesting points and ideas. I’ve always found small-talk to be awkward and the author gives tips on how to make the conversation flow and sound more interesting, and more interested in the other person.

Conversations 

Conversations are the threads that weave the fabric of social interaction, and they serve two primary purposes: entertainment and utility. The art of conversation lies in the delicate balance between these two elements, ensuring that our interactions are both enjoyable and productive.

At the heart of our interactions are the six primary emotions: happiness, sadness, fear, anger, surprise, and disgust. These emotions are universal and often drive the direction and tone of our conversations. Recognizing and responding to these emotions in others can lead to more meaningful and empathetic communication.

Small talk

Small talk plays a crucial role in initiating conversations and building rapport. Common small talk questions include inquiries about one’s day, weekend, work, family, and plans. Small talk, often seen as a necessary evil, is widely disliked for its superficial nature. It’s a societal construct designed to convey politeness, yet it often feels insincere. The key to transcending small talk lies in personalising the conversation with genuine interest and shared stories.

To engage effectively in small talk, one should aim to provide entertainment, make the other person feel good, and offer substantial content that allows the conversation to flow with minimal effort. This can be achieved through two methods:

1. Answering a fuzzy version of the question: This involves focusing on a keyword from the question and expanding on it with a more interesting or entertaining anecdote. For example, if asked about the weekend, one might share a memorable weekend experience from the past rather than a mundane recount of the past days.

2. Completely redirecting the conversation: By briefly acknowledging the question and then pivoting to a more engaging topic, one can steer the conversation away from generic small talk. Using transitional phrases like “it was good, but did you hear about…” can quickly shift the focus to something of mutual interest.

What Would Jay Leno Do?

“You can make more friends in two months by becoming truly interested in other people than you can in two years by trying to get other people interested in you.” 

Dale Carnegie

When people sense you care, they respond in kind and open up. The best way to articulate this is to picture your favourite talk show host. The guest is the centre of his world for the next ten minutes. His genuine curiosity, enthusiastic reactions, and positive demeanour not only make his guests feel valued but also entertain and engage his audience. This approach is highlighted as a model for personal interactions, where showing real interest in others can lead to more meaningful and reciprocal relationships.

Everyone has unique knowledge and experiences. By being curious about others, we acknowledge that every person we meet can teach us something new, thereby enriching our own lives. This mindset encourages a sense of humility and openness to learning from others.

Be aware of social narcissism, where conversations are dominated by one’s own interests, disregarding the value of others’ experiences. This behaviour is characterised by listening only to respond rather than to understand, and it hinders the development of genuine connections.

Break The Ice

Social interactions, especially in settings such as networking events or parties, can often feel like navigating a minefield. The challenge of breaking into a conversation group can seem daunting, as if invisible barriers are erected around them. Common internal objections include the fear of interrupting, appearing awkward, or being perceived as strange.

However, the key to overcoming these social hurdles lies in establishing a “Social Goal.” This goal acts as a beacon, overriding any social defence mechanisms. It could be as specific as learning about an individual, collecting a set of business cards, or memorising names at a gathering.

To facilitate this process, icebreakers can be invaluable. They can be categorised into three types:

1. Subjective Queries: These involve asking for personal opinions on topics of mutual interest, such as the music at a party. It’s a way to show curiosity and invite others to share their passions.   

2. Objective Inquiries: These are questions about factual information, like the time, directions to the nearest café, or the location of the host. Such questions are non-threatening and serve as a natural entry point into a conversation.   

3. Comments on Shared Reality: Observations about the immediate environment or universally acknowledged truths can also serve as icebreakers. By expressing an opinion on something already within the other person’s awareness, it opens up the floor for a shared discussion.

Interestingly, it’s perfectly acceptable to ask questions to which you already know the answers. The primary aim is not to seek information but to initiate interaction and establish a connection.

In essence, breaking the ice is less about the content of the conversation and more about the willingness to engage. Remember, the objective is to engage, not to impress. With practice, the art of conversation becomes less of a challenge and more of a rewarding journey.

Never Laugh First

Initiating laughter in a conversation might inadvertently pressure others to conform to your emotional state, potentially creating discomfort. Moreover, it hinders your ability to assess the genuine humour of your remarks.

Belief Police

We feel that since we know so much better than the other person, we have some sort of responsibility to correct them. We then take it upon ourselves to prove to them just how smart we are. We can’t stand someone believing something wrong to what we believe. This habit is obnoxious to talk to. 

Questions

When you ask a general question, you will get a general answer. Questions like “what do you do for fun?” are hard to answer because no one thinks about their life in such broad terms. You want to enable people to be lazy and open ended questions actually make us think quite a bit and inject lulls into the conversation. “What is your favourite movie of all time?” This is hard because it wants one single answer and to represent you in a positive light. It can be hard to think of a single movie. A better question is “what’s a good movie you have seen recently?”. You can easily recall a movie you have seen recently and it doesn’t have to be the best. So the advice is to put boundaries and qualifiers on your question to make it less specific. You can even provide answers/prompts, so “what do you do for fun?” can be prompted with “playing sports, go outdoors, or music”.

Take The Hint

Recognizing cues of disinterest, such as a lack of engagement, prolonged silences, or shifting to generic topics, is crucial in respecting the other person’s boundaries and maintaining a comfortable conversation flow.

Eye Contact

Balancing eye contact is key; too much can be as disconcerting as too little. A general guideline is to maintain eye contact 80% of the time when listening and 50% when speaking to foster a sense of ease and attentiveness.

HPM, SBR, & EDR

HPM emphasises the use of personal experiences (History), personal opinions (Philosophy), and associative thinking (Metaphor) to engage in a conversation. 

SBR is a method of guiding a conversation by asking questions. ‘Specific‘ questions delve into the details of a topic, ‘Broad‘ questions open up new avenues for discussion, and ‘Related‘ questions tie in relevant but potentially separate ideas, allowing the conversation to flow naturally and informatively.

EDR focuses on emotional intelligence, asking for specifics, and confirming understanding. By acknowledging emotions (Emotion), probing for more information (Detail), and paraphrasing what has been said (Restatements), a person can demonstrate empathy, interest, and attentiveness, which are crucial for meaningful interactions.

Together, these strategies provide a comprehensive framework for effective communication, whether in casual conversations or more formal discussions. They encourage a deeper connection between individuals by fostering an environment where personal stories, emotions, and details are valued and explored.

Storytelling

1. Detail-Oriented Approach: Instead of crafting a full narrative, focus on providing five distinct, specific details. These serve as hooks, leading the listener from one piece of information to another, creating a chain of engaging tidbits.

2. Emotion-Driven Narrative: Concentrate on encapsulating a single motion or emotion in one sentence. Stories should evoke emotional responses, such as happiness, empathy, surprise, or curiosity.

Breaking into banter

Use light misunderstandings, double entendres, puns, and comical confusion to break the ice and introduce humour into the conversation.

Flow

Avoid stagnation by shifting the conversation to related topics, delving deeper into subjects, sharing personal experiences, inquiring about favourites, discussing emotions, expressing nuanced opinions, posing hypothetical questions, or referencing friends and articles.

Conversation Threading

This technique enhances your ability to respond quickly and thoughtfully in conversations. As a listener, use the storytelling method to pick up on topics and steer the conversation in a direction that interests you. For instance, if skiing is mentioned but holds no interest for you, pivot the discussion to talk about mountains or related experiences.

By employing these methods, you can transform simple exchanges into memorable conversations that resonate with those involved. Whether you’re a storyteller or a keen listener, the key is to keep the conversation moving, engaging, and full of life. Remember, the goal is not just to talk but to connect.

This is very concerning to hear

On a code review, a Senior Developer, Lee questioned why there was no database changes when the Developer Neil had removed all the related C# server code. Neil replied that he “wasn’t sure how the patching process worked” (despite being here years, and was in a team with experienced developers), and wasn’t sure if there were any backwards compatibility issues to consider.

So what was his plan? just hope it gets past the code review stage unchallenged? Then we would have some obsolete stored procedures, and unused data lingering in the database for years?

I initially thought his claim for backwards compatibility issues was nonsensical but from an architectural standpoint, it makes sense due to how it works in our system. The server code doesn’t call the other’s server; it goes direct. So that means if the old version calls the new version, then it would expect the stored procedures and data to exist. However, for this particular feature there were no cross-database calls at all.

I suppose being cautious and not deleting the data makes sense from a rollback point of view. It’s hard to restore the data if it is lost, but easy to restore the C# code. I have never seen us use this approach though.

The Senior Developer said :

This is very concerning to hear, can you please work with your team lead to understand how our versions are deployed, and if they are unable to answer all the questions, please reach out to someone. We do not support any version changes by default, though there are cases where we do have cross version server/database calls, but these are for specific cross organisation activities.
You can safely remove these columns, update these stored procedures.
There is no value in leaving something half in the system, if it is no longer needed, remove all references, database rows/columns/tables, class Properties, etc.

In my previous blog, I discussed Project vs Domain Teams. This is kinda linked in the sense that specialising in a certain area of the system means you gain knowledge of the functionality and architecture of that area. There would be less chance of this scenario happening where the developer is questioning if there could be backwards compatibility issues. However, he could have also found this information out by raising questions.

This example does cover many topics I have discussed on this blog:

  • Poor communication
  • Bad decisions
  • Funny quote from a senior developer ”This is very concerning to hear”